Friday, 29 August 2008

  • McCain getting a little desperate?

    Today, Republic presidential candidate John McCain tagged Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his Vice President for the November election. Before I start, am I the only one that thinks she looks like Tina Fey from SNL?


    On a more serious note: I have nothing against seeing a woman on the presidential ticket, she has every right to, and McCain has every right to choose her, and from a viewer's standpoint, its great news to see a woman running for Vice President! But to me, it seems a little suspicious. Why? If you've been following the National Democratic Convention this week, all the Democratic superstars have been celebrating over and over again the significance of this week's anniversaries of women's suffrage (point to Hillary Clinton) and Dr. Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech (point to Barak Obama). The Dem's seem to have so much to celebrate in this campaign, proudly showing that they have and are making history in this year's election, from the rise of so much support for a woman candidate in early primaries all the way to nomination of an African American man for the November election.

    Now, back to McCain. Poor old McCain (and I mean, old, the guy turns 72 today; Happy Birthday, Senator!)  has been the center of Democrat attacks all week, mainly focused on his "old politics" ideals and strategies and more so his likeness to President Bush with regards to legislative decisions and foreign policy (and then some). I imagine McCain watching the DNC this week, seeing Obama and his supporters chanting, "We're making history here! This is a historical moment! Be a part of this, America!", and thinking to himself, "Man, I wish I could make history." So what does he do? He uses his pick for Veep --which to me is so odd because for such a big decision, it seems to be one that has the most open-ended result with little political processes (in other words, you just picked whoever the heck you want!)-- as an opportunity to do something he can't, make history. Sure, we're not gonna see a woman go to the White House this year, but a Vice President! That's something new! Yay, now that the Republicans have their new toy they can join the Obama and the rest of the kids in the cool-history-making-kids sandbox!

    Now before we all start saying, "You can't say that, Steven, she has every right to be a Vice President! It doesn't matter if she's a woman." I want to agree with this in that yes, it doesn't matter if she's a woman because she has every right to be on that ticket. However, what is the reasoning behind McCain's choice? I mean, a Vice President is the second to the commander in chief! Given, yes, in US history the Veep is often just some guy that sits on the side, and maybe once in a while has to make a huge decision when there's a tie on the Senate floor. But the more important role comes into play if something should happen to the President. So the question at hand is, if something were to happen to John McCain, would Palin be ready to take the office of President? Let's look at her resume (according to Wiki):

    4 years on the City Council for Wasilla, Alaska (Wasilla's population is an estimated 8,500)
    6 years as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska
    1 year as Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Committee Commissionor
    1/2 way through her first term as Alaska's governor

    Qualified? Sure, a little over 10 years of political experience is fine, on a city and state level. I did a little reading on her, and she's actually doing a great job as a governor, with a 90% approval rating; she's also made some pretty big stands against corruption in the her state government and also against big oil. But the question comes down to: is she qualified to be the President of the United States? I'm not too convinced. Now I don't want to bring all the focus to the Vice President because yes, McCain is still the main guy, but my point is here that his choice for Veep seems a little suspect, fueled more by a desperate attempt to keep up with the "celebrity" Democrats than a wise, foresight-based selection of a semi-important political partner. We know Obama just picked up a ton of Clinton supporters, a huge majority of which are women. Seems like McCain needs a little bit of girl power too to get those voters back. But is that grounds for choosing a Vice President??

    I'll be blunt: John McCain is using a level-headed, well-meaning, well-respected woman to get himself into office.

    Agree? Disagree? Let's hear it! =)

    EDIT: Going off the earlier analogy, I decided to try my hand at political cartooning. It's my first! =)
    (sorry i accidentally deleted earlier comments without reading them! whoever you were, please repost!)

Thursday, 24 July 2008

  • Dear editors at the Irvine World News (if it still exists),


    Hi, my name is Steven Wang. I've been an Irvine resident for 22 years, and I must say, I was shocked to open up Tuesday, July 22's issue of the Irvine World News and find that the newspaper I had once loved and trusted to get information about my community was completely run over by advertisements. I did a quick count of how much actual material was in the paper, and of the 32 pages of this issue (including the cover), only a third of the page space was dedicated news-related material! Now I don't know if this is something that's been going on for a while, and if it has, I haven't been around to notice since I just got back from graduating college. Regardless, how is it possible that you can fill a 32-page newspaper with nearly 20 pages of advertising? To say that there is not enough to write about would be a poor excuse, given that the few articles that are printed would hardly be considered an article, length-wise, in a junior high English class! A quick glance at your Staff on Page 2 shows us where your priority is: one Team Leader, three Editors, four Reporters, one Photographer, and FOUR people on Advertising. You have the same number of staff reporting news as there is taking care of advertising; I found your problem!

    Need examples? How about your potentially-great cover story on Michelle Lynne Cook's amazing 109-day journey? I found the topic to be fascinating, and turned the page expecting the article to continue, only to find a small table of contents that gives away just about as much information as the articles themselves, and two oversized advertisements on a cooking class and ballet camp, and on the opposite side, a entire PAGE advertisement from Cox trying to sell us digital telephone and cable services! Another short-cut article is the one about the special event held at Wild Rivers for the Marines! Did you really think that we would rather stare at an orange-skied, dandelion-blowing advertisement from Comerica Bank than to learn more about the lives of our local heroes and their families during and after the war, and how our community is showing our appreciation? Three short paragraphs is all we get. Any time I read an article that seemed to be interesting, there was a severe deficit of information, usually followed by a "Want more? Check out ocregister.com/irvine." Where are the old day papers of Irvine World News that not only provided informative, thought-provoking articles on our community, but encouraged our readers to get involved? There are no editorials or opinion columns from Irvine residents, hardly anything about our schools, and there is even one page that seemed so desperate for news that you felt the need to include news from "Around O.C." Isn't that what the OC Register is for? Or, am I correct in guessing that there really is no such thing as the Irvine World News anymore, just a giant OC Register that sends out an obligatory "community-focused" paper every couple of days?

    Irvine has already been taken over by strip mall after strip mall filled with same corporate businesses trying to make a buck off us. Nearly all traces of our proud history and local businesses have been stamped out by greedy businessmen trying to sell our community things we don't need. Irvine struggles to have anything unique to offer its residents. It's no wonder our high school kids are so bored that there is huge alcohol and marijuana problem plaguing our top-notch schools , or do we not address that in the public paper? Now answer this question: Who's supposed to stand up to all this? Where are Irvine residents supposed to voice their opinions and frustrations? Who can convince our city to ditch those 42-inch plasma TV's, Nintendo Wii's, private backyard pools and BBQ's, and come outside and enjoy each other's company as a community? Our newspaper. Or at least it used to be. The city's leadership has already sold us out for the big money (ahem-The"Great"Park), please don't do the same. You, my friends at the Irvine World News, are OUR newspaper, created to inform and represent US. We want our news, and our people, not a shopping catalog. Don't become one of them. Because if you do, someday Irvine won't have her own newspaper anymore. Just a card that shows up on people's driveways that says, "Want news about Irvine? Go find it yourself, it's somewhere on the Internet. By the way, buy something."

                                 Sincerely,

                                    Steven Wang

    PS. Feel free to publish parts, or the entirety, of this letter in upcoming Irvine World papers. Sorry if the whole letter is a little too long to be an article, I know you're not used to it.

Tuesday, 15 July 2008

  • Perspective on education today...

    (in response to a discussion question for a class...)

    As much as I would like to think that the creation of public education was fueled by the desire to enrich individuals, I regret the fact that a look into the politics and economy of the United States in both the past and present blatantly reflects that public education is a stage for promoting national unity and the stimulation of our economy. So much emphasis has been placed on education as a prerequisite for success that, especially today, our adolescents (and adults) are tearing at one another for the few open spots in today's colleges and job markets. Education has no longer become a journey of learning and exploration; instead it's transformed into a disgusting ladder game in which the players compete with one another to get to the next level. High school students don't care any more about what they learn (or how they learn/cheat/cram), all that matters are the grades. The numbers. The test scores. All products of a society that no longer values the ethics of human character and worth; replaced by a work force that sees a retiree not as a valued source of origin and wisdom, but a "burn-out," or an outdated element, replaced by the newest, more efficient, robotic "upgrade".

    It is for this reason that I believe education needs to go back to the basics; to the pedagogy and paradigm of the Ancients. We need to go back to a system that teaches that success comes those who earnestly seek wisdom and knowledge with the purpose of improving our world. That our achievement should not be measured by our net sales, or million-dollar grants, or million-person campaigns; rather, that our self-worth be found in the positive impact we have on our generation, generations to come, perhaps even the generation before us. This should be the underlying motive for education: To teach our children Science to cure disease and environmental devastation; Math to solve the economic problems of the poor; English to speak out for the oppressed; and History to guide our nations away from paths of war and injustice. When this becomes our motivation to teach, it will become their motivation to learn; and at that moment, all academic "standards" will be surpassed, replaced by a true passion for learning, fueled by purpose.

Tuesday, 19 February 2008

  • Life vs. Living

    Just got back from an amazing weekend in Bishop. I'm really serious, the more and more I venture out into the unknown realms of the non-Los Angeles area, the more I'm realizing there is so much more to life than what we know. And no, this time its not about social injustice or poverty or the social pressures of the inner city (though still important). This weekend I met dozens of new people, from Canada to Tahoe to Italy to the Netherlands. All gathered in a half-mile wide dirt pit speckled with tents and 70's era RV's, huddled around a small campfire, sharing stories of climbing, travels, and for some, celebrating the abandonment of their former lives. Story after story came from young and old of how they have high-paying jobs waiting for them back at home, yet they choose to reduce their belongings to what can fit in a car, and trade their 5 bedroom home and fancy cars for a tent and a diesel pickup. But for what? E.T. could be making over $100k at his programming job, why would he sell his house and move into the dirt? There's a weekly late-night pilgrimage into town with a truck to collect old pallets for firewood. There are the week-long snow storms that shake canvas walls and winds that send staked tents soaring through the air. There's the sneer of sarcasm when the LA yuppy pulls into camp with his $40k SUV and 7-person tent (for 2). And then of course, there's the morning. Every morning, walking outside the tent, making a cup of coffee over the fire, scanning the dry desert tableland, and then letting your eyes rise up to the snow-covered Sierras. I'm serious, I've never seen happier people. The more and more I travel now, and the more time I spend in the money-strapped society of Southern California, the more I'm realizing that we don't need it all. It makes me sick. People trade their lives for the pursuit of things that mean nothing. High paying jobs. $600 cell phones. Gleaming cars. Houses that could fit 3 families. Even (yes, even) beautiful stainless steel kitchens fit for a professional cook, untouched by yups that hardly know how to boil water. They're some of the most cold, anti-human (different from anti-social), miserable, insecure people you'll ever see. I'm not telling you to sell everything out move into a tent outside Bishop like guys like E.T. and John and Carrie. But for the love of God, and yourself, find what you love to do and don't compromise. Find your passion, then live for it. That high you get driving around a new car or getting that promotion or getting that acceptance letter will fade quickly, and only be replaced by a desire for something else. Trim down your life to what really matters, throw away the things you don't need. Find that cause that breaks your heart, and dedicate yourself to it. Find that hobby that makes your heart explode with joy, and do it. Find the people that make you feel human again, and stick with them. Don't waste your time, don't waste your life. Just because you're breathing, doesn't mean you're living.

    "I have sacrificed 101 modern conveniences, but gained 1,001 priceless experiences"- Cedar Wright

    *EDIT: Added Pictures

    IMG_1704 (Small) IMG_1732 (Small)
    IMG_1759 (Small) IMG_1742 (Small)
    IMG_1715 (Small) IMG_1716 (Small)
    IMG_1724 (Small) IMG_1723 (Small)
    IMG_1731 (Small) IMG_1709 (Small)
    IMG_1739 (Small) IMG_1756 (Small)
    IMG_1711 (Small)

    Top to Bottom, Left to Right:
    John working on Saigon, Hanging out at Dom's tent, The Buttermilks, Eric warming up,
    Crash pads, Our camp, The newest couple in camp, Red and Chaco, Jack and Red,
    Working Saigon, Dom watching the send, Andrew working Iron Man, The Sierras by moonlight

Wednesday, 13 February 2008

  • It's finally happening.

    You know what they say: you haven't experienced college until you've spent Spring Break down in Mexico. But this one's a little different. No sandy beaches, no wet t-shirt contests, no endless rivers of tequila and beer. Just me, Todd, our rope, and 2,300 ft of beautiful Mexican limestone. I've been waiting a long time for this.

    CheapTickets.com Flight Reservation:

    Sat, Mar 22, 2008
    Departs 11:05am, Arrives 6:05pm
    American Airlines 2300 / 1195
    Los Angeles, CA to Monterrey, Mexico

    Fri, Mar 28, 2008
    Departs 7:45am, Arrives 9:55am
    Mexicana 924
    Monterrey, Mexico to Los Angeles, CA

    Total flight cost:$488.04 USD
     (good thing its only gonna cost $50 for the rest of the week!)

    And thats just the finish of this awesome quarter: This weekend is bouldering and sport climbing dirtbag style in Bishop with the Riverside crew, next weekend is an almost-complimentary Vegas weekend with the USC crew, and a few weekends after that, up to San Francisco with Jas to meet the rents. eesh.

Wednesday, 16 January 2008

  • My new "toys"!

    Went into the Disney Store at Tyler the other day hoping that they were still selling these (I saw them before the movie even came out, but decided to buy it later), and not only did they have them, they were on clearance (sad, i know) for like 60% off!!!!! Pretty much, I'm a happy guy...


    Ratatouille Cork Screw and Bottle Stopper Set AND

    w00t

Tuesday, 01 January 2008

  • I'm an ENFJ

    I took an online test based on the Jung- Myers-Briggs typological test for personality type (Pastor James, this is the one I was talking about). Looks like God led me to the perfect career choice (of course!), only 2-3 percent of the population are ENFJ, the Idealist Teacher. Take the test (its short, only 72 yes/no questions) here: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes1.htm

    Here's my ENJF type description by D. Keirsey (if you take the test, click on the first link to find your type description). An Overview of the temperments.

    The Portait of the Teacher (ENFJ)

    The Idealists called Teachers are abstract in their thought and speech, cooperative in their style of achieving goals, and directive and extraverted in their interpersonal relations. Learning in the young has to be beckoned forth, teased out from its hiding place, or, as suggested by the word "education," it has to be "educed." by an individual with educative capabilities. Such a one is the eNFj, thus rightly called the educative mentor or Teacher for short. The Teacher is especially capable of educing or calling forth those inner potentials each learner possesses. Even as children the Teachers may attract a gathering of other children ready to follow their lead in play or work. And they lead without seeming to do so.

    Teachers expect the very best of those around them, and this expectation, usually expressed as enthusiastic encouragement, motivates action in others and the desire to live up to their expectations. Teachers have the charming characteristic of taking for granted that their expectations will be met, their implicit commands obeyed, never doubting that people will want to do what they suggest. And, more often than not, people do, because this type has extraordinary charisma.

    The Teachers are found in no more than 2 or 3 percent of the population. They like to have things settled and arranged. They prefer to plan both work and social engagements ahead of time and tend to be absolutely reliable in honoring these commitments. At the same time, Teachers are very much at home in complex situations which require the juggling of much data with little pre-planning. An experienced Teacher group leader can dream up, effortlessly, and almost endlessly, activities for groups to engage in, and stimulating roles for members of the group to play. In some Teachers, inspired by the responsiveness of their students or followers, this can amount to genius which other types find hard to emulate. Such ability to preside without planning reminds us somewhat of an Provider, but the latter acts more as a master of ceremonies than as a leader of groups. Providers are natural hosts and hostesses, making sure that each guest is well looked after at social gatherings, or that the right things are expressed on traditional occasions, such as weddings, funerals, graduations, and the like. In much the same way, Teachers value harmonious human relations about all else, can handle people with charm and concern, and are usually popular wherever they are. But Teachers are not so much social as educational leaders, interested primarily in the personal growth and development of others, and less in attending to their social needs.

    Mikhail Gorbachev, Oprah Winfrey, Pope John Paul II, Ralph Nader, John Wooden, and Margaret Mead are examples of Teacher Idealists.

    SIDE NOTE: retreat was awesome.
    1) discipling young people to follow Christ is such a blessing
    2) now commited to full time ministry
    3) Praise God.

Friday, 30 November 2007

  • Finally, the winter rain is here!

    Coffee + Jazz + Rain = A perfect day.

    Maybe Seattle or Portland wouldn't be bad for me after all. =) On a not-so-different-but-still different note, the clouds were beautiful the other night, here at UCR:

    UCRclouds

    I wish I had a tripod to get a high-res shot of this... but it was still such a treat, how can I even complain? Funny how even as stopped in the middle of the walkway, threw my backpack on the ground, and shot pictures of the sky, people kept walking by without even looking up. Such beauty and majesty right in front of you, and you walk by with eyes fixed on the ground! Reminds me of how we treat God sometimes...

    PS. To Xanga stalkers from New Jersey, Virginia, D.C., Georgia, and New York, quit being such strangers! I know you're reading this so at least say hi or something! =)

Sunday, 25 November 2007

  • Wine and Cheese Review

    Time for another wine and cheese review, and this time, both hail from the tasty land of France!

    The Cheese: Etorki, French Basque Mauleon
    The Wine: 2000 Christian Moueix Merlot, Bordeaux

    The Cheese: I discovered this cheese at Whole Foods while having a discussion with the cheese lady about the different kinds of milk used to make cheese, and how the milk affects the taste of the cheese. On the subject of goat cheese, she suggested I try Etorki, a cheese made from sheep's milk, and compare it to that of a chevre. I ended up taking a wedge home with me that day, and now I'm here reviewing my first French/Sheep cheese. The cheese itself is a hard rind, made in Mauleon in the French Basque country. Intitially it has a Swiss-type of flavor to it, dry and sharp, but it quickly smooths out as the cheese melts on your tongue, and gives rise to a pleasant creamy, pungent warmness that is plain TASTY. The finish on it has the lingering traces of goat chevre that the cheese lady was talking about, especially if you pass air over your tongue on the finish; there is a grassy, earthy quality to the cheese's linger that is both unusual and pleasant. Overall, a very delicious cheese, and unlike last time's Chimay, the first few bites will draw you in as a fan.

    etorki

    The Wine: Before I start this part, lemme say that this wine is GREAT! Okay, so my cousin brought over this Christian Moueix Merlot, and from what I read this guy has over 10 wineries dispersed throughout the banks of Bordeaux's Gironde River. It's an Appellation Bordeux Controlee wine, meaning its been approved by France's AOC system that regulates and authenticates the wine's location, and certifies that it has been made according to the region's traditional winemaking styles and methods. The Merlot has an interesting nose, less fruit-like than many other wines I've had; instead, its more earthy and woody, with only slight undertones of black berry. The front palate is very pleasant: a perfect balance of smoothness and acidity, and I put an emphasis on SMOOTH! It has a medium body, and the finish is dry and slightly peppery. Black and dark fruit flavors are more apparent mid-palate, largely attributed to the smoothness of the wine; the body and tannin of fuller wines get in the way of you enjoying the fruit. The finish is as pleasant as the start, and it leaves your mouth thinking, "that wasn't bad at all, give me more!". Overall, this is easily one of my favorite wines, and from the looks of it, the price isn't too bad either; ranging from $10-$15, depending on the vintage. This one has got me excited to try more Merlots, although I have a feeling that a Bordeaux Merlot is different, both in body and complexity, from other popular Merlots, like ones from California.

    mouiex-merlot

Friday, 23 November 2007

  • Dating vs. Courtship

    Hey everyone (Happy Thanksgiving, btw!), I just wanted to share a cool article I found this morning. Like many of you, I've always asked the question, "What is the Christian view of dating?", and honestly, I've had no clue, besides knowing to have a "God-centered relationship". I've heard the word courtship being thrown around, and have always passed it off as some irrelevant, medieval ritual without really knowing what it was. The following is an excerpt from a series of online articles (link) written by Nathan Bailey regarding dating and courtship, and it's really opened by eyes to a solid, Biblical perspective of relationships. There's also another short excerpt at the bottom from another site that discusses Josh Harris' Boy Meets Girl. I've learned a lot from it, and hope you will too.

    The youth of today are getting ripped off. Instead of enjoying their teen years as they build skills and character, they are getting distracted into the quagmire of relationships that they are not equipped to conduct. The teen years are those where they have the fewest responsibilities at the same time as having their greatest energy level. These should be fun times, exciting times. They should be an opportunity to develop a deep, intimate and personal walk with God, establishing themselves as young warriors who know the Father and have overcome the evil one (1 John 2:13). (...)

    An overview of dating and Courtship:

    Dating was invented in the early part of this century. Prior to that time, marriage always involved much more input from the parents, and "trial relationships" leading up to marriage were not conducted at all. Courtship, as discussed in more detail subsequently, seeks to emulate the Godly models described in the Bible that were conducted by God's people up until the invention of dating. My basic premise is that regardless of how we feel about things, we should follow God's model, because it will be the most effective and fulfilling. My intention is to convey that conviction, then to describe my current understanding of His model.

    In overview, courting should only happen once and ends in a life-long covenant relationship. Dating happens lots of times, and ends in many hurts, heartbreaks, scars, and if you're lucky, a partner that just may stay with you for the next few years, or (if you're really lucky) the rest of your life.

    • In the modern dating scene you usually hide all your faults to give a false impression about yourself, in order to keep your partner liking you. Recreational dating is about self-gratification -- you date to satisfy your own needs.
    • Courtship is about open and honest exploration of each others lives and families leading up to engagement and marriage. Courtship is about marriage -- you court in order to see if there is any reason why you shouldn't get married. There is no romantic interaction until after the commitment to marriage.

    What's wrong with dating?

    There are many forms of dating, perhaps as many as there are people. Everyone has a different view of what is right and wrong. But there is a glaring fault in many of our models, a double-standard. Once we are married, we recognize that certain things are sacred to our partner. Things such as co-habitation, kissing, intimate hugging, sex and bringing up children. We recognize that not only our physical body, but our emotions, even our spirit are dedicated to that one partner, for the rest of our life (according to our vows).

    The dichotomy is this: in dating, we presume to partake of many of these privileges of marriage. We would be shocked if a married man had an emotional attachment to another woman, and yet it's quite acceptable for singles to have a different emotional attachment every week. On the one hand, we save sex for our partners (and some even do that sparingly), but on the other, we engage in rampant emotional promiscuity, giving pieces of our hearts away until one wonders what will be left for that special, life-long partner.

    Another really good excerpt from an online article (link):

    But why is courtship better than dating? Dating has become a very self-centered pastime, driven by lust and greed. Courtship is centered not on any person, but on God. During a courtship, you are "dating for the glory of God", as Joshua Harris says. Instead of dating the other person for their physical appearance or their suave charms, you are dating them to establish a solid relationship and decide whether or not marriage is God’s will for you. In Boy Meets Girl, Joshua Harris divides the process of courtship into three neat steps: friendship, fellowship, and romance. He encourages us first to "deepen your friendship" before going forward in the relationship, ensuring that this person is someone you’re willing to spend a lifetime with. "Don’t rush or try to force your way into each other’s lives," he says. "The pace should be unhurried." The next important step is that of fellowship, growing closer together spiritually.

    As your relationship unfolds, you want to make sure it has a spiritual foundation. For your relationship to be strong, love for God must be the common passion of your hearts…you can read Christian books together, talk about sermons after a service, and discuss how you’re going to apply what you learn…biblical fellowship means increasing your love and passion for God, not your emotional dependence on each other.

    (Joshua Harris, Boy Meets Girl, chapter 5)

    Good stuff, huh? This definitely changes how I see things... =)